

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Computer Scientists on Twitter
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12942
Computer Scientists on Twitter
This dataset contains the data used in the paper Identifying and Analyzing Researchers on Twitter (http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2615676). At the moment, this includes computer scientists, though an extension to other disciplines is planned. The data can be cited as follows: Asmelash Teka Hadgu and Robert Jäschke. 2014. Identifying and Analyzing Researchers on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci '14). 23-30. ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI: 10.1145/2615569.2615676
EOSC: Twitter Data
EOSC: Twitter Data
2 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2014IsSupplementTo
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average visibility views 1K download downloads 219 citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!
- 1Kviews219downloads



This dataset contains the data used in the paper Identifying and Analyzing Researchers on Twitter (http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2615676). At the moment, this includes computer scientists, though an extension to other disciplines is planned. The data can be cited as follows: Asmelash Teka Hadgu and Robert Jäschke. 2014. Identifying and Analyzing Researchers on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci '14). 23-30. ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI: 10.1145/2615569.2615676