
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Files and metadata associated with the EMDataBank/Unified Data Resource for 3DEM 2015/2016 Models Challenge hosted at challenges.emdatabank.org are deposited. All members of the Scientific Community--at all levels of experience--were invited to participate as Challengers, and/or as Assessors. Eight recently determined target structures were selected for the challenge. All of the maps were archived in the EM Data Bank (EMDB; http://emdatabank.org). In total 16 Challengers created 106 models and uploaded their results with associated details. In the zip files, each entry is represented in a folder containing the original deposition upload (deposited_EM.pdb), initial processing at RCSB/Rutgers (deposited_EM_edited.pdb, maxit.cif, maxit.cif.pdb) and final model version evaluated (model-compare.pdb) at UC Davis (http://model-compare.emdatabank.org). This model challenge was one of two community-wide challenges sponsored by EMDataBank in 2015/2016 to critically evaluate 3DEM methods that are coming into use, with the ultimate goal of developing validation criteria associated with every 3DEM map and map-derived model.
{"references": ["Henderson et al (2012) Outcome of the first electron microscopy validation task force meeting. doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.12.014", "Lawson et al (2016) EMDataBank unified data resource for 3DEM. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1126"]}
The 2015/2016 Model Challenge was supported by the US National Institutes of Health / National Institute for General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS) Under Grant Number R01 GM079429 to Wah Chiu (PI).
cryoEM, validation, https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?name=Imaging,%20Three%20Dimensional, cryo electron microscopy, benchmark, https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?name=Cryoelectron%20Microscopy, challenge, https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?name=Databases,%20Protein, https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?ui=D008958, https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?name=Microscopy,%20Electron, https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?name=Benchmarking
cryoEM, validation, https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?name=Imaging,%20Three%20Dimensional, cryo electron microscopy, benchmark, https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?name=Cryoelectron%20Microscopy, challenge, https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?name=Databases,%20Protein, https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?ui=D008958, https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?name=Microscopy,%20Electron, https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?name=Benchmarking
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 11 | |
downloads | 18 |