Subgroup analyses.

Dataset UNKNOWN
Stokes, Jonathan; Panagioti, Maria; Alam, Rahul; Checkland, Kath; Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh; Bower, Peter;
(2015)
  • Publisher: Figshare
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132340.t002, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136737.t004
  • Subject: cca | effectiveness | prospero | ci | Cochrane EPOC group | Coronary CT Angiography | Biological Sciences | support case management | future.Review ProtocolThe review protocol | cta | cars | case management | Uncategorised | effect favouring case management | crd | subgroup analyses | Myocardial CT Perfusion | ctp | nct | Conventional Coronary Angiography | patient acceptance

<p>Values are given as arithmetic mean ± standard deviation (SD) or number of patients (%).The scale used for preparation and information prior to the test comfort, and overall satisfaction was: 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = moderate, 4 = poor, 5 = very poor. Helplessnes... View more
Share - Bookmark

  • Download from
    figshare via figshare (Dataset, 2015)
  • Cite this research data