This archive contains sample output files for the sample data accompanying the Princeton Handbook for Reproducible Neuroimaging. Outputs include the NIfTI images converted using HeuDiConv (v0.8.0) and organized according to the BIDS standard, quality control evaluation using MRIQC (v0.15.1), data preprocessed using fMRIPrep (v20.2.0), and other auxiliary files. All outputs were created according to the procedures outlined in the handbook, and are intended to serve as a didactic reference for use with the handbook. The sample data from which the outputs are derived were acquired (with informed consent) using the ReproIn naming convention on a Siemens Skyra 3T MRI scanner. The sample data include a T1-weighted anatomical image, four functional runs with the “prettymouth” spoken story stimulus, and one functional run with a block design emotional faces task, as well as auxiliary scans (e.g., scout, soundcheck). The “prettymouth” story stimulus created by Yeshurun et al., 2017 and is available as part of the Narratives collection, and the emotional faces task is similar to Chai et al., 2015. The brain data are contributed by author S.A.N. and are authorized for non-anonymized distribution.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5281/zenodo.3727774&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 0 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5281/zenodo.3727774&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This repository contains information about submitted solutions and resulting analysis metrics of the 2019 Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Reconstruction Challenge. The original susceptibility maps submitted for participation in the challenge are available here and here. The package contains seven Comma-Separated Values (CSV) files and two PDF files: master_stage1_anonymized.csv: Results of stage 1 of the challenge at the time of presentation at the workshop (fully-blinded); master_stage2_snr1_anonymized.csv: Results of stage 2 of the challenge using the high noise dataset at the time of presentation at the workshop (fully-blinded); master_stage2_snr2_anonymized.csv: Results of stage 2 of the challenge using the low noise dataset at the time of presentation at the workshop (fully-blinded); submission_form_stage1.pdf: PDF export of the online form used in stage 1; submission_form_stage2.pdf: PDF export of the online form used in stage 2. For the manuscript, we analyzed these CSV files with scripts reported here. Each csv file contains metrics for all submitted solutions along with detailed information about the algorithm used, provided by the participant at the time of submission. The very first record in each file is a header containing a list of field names: normalized rmse: Whole-brain root-mean-squared error relative to ground truth; rmse_detrend_tissue: Root-mean-squared error relative to ground truth (after detrending) in grey and white matter mask; rmse_detrend_blood: Root-mean-squared error relative to ground truth (after detrending) using a one-pixel dilated vein mask; rmse_detrend_DGM: Root-mean-squared error relative to ground truth (after detrending) in a deep gray matter mask (substantia nigra & subthalamic nucleus, red nucleus, dentate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus and caudate); DeviationFromLinearSlope: Absolute difference between the slope of the average value of the six deep gray matter regions vs. the prescribed mean value and 1.0; CalcStreak: Estimation of the impact of the streaking artifact in a region of interest surrounding the calcification through the standard deviation of the difference map between reconstruction and the ground truth; DeviationFromCalcMoment: Absolute deviation from the volumetric susceptibility moment of the reconstructed calcification, compared to the ground truth (computed at in the high-resolution model); Submission Identifier: Self-chosen unique identifier of the submission; Submission Identifier of the corresponding Stage 1 submission: This is the Submission Identifier of the solution submitted to Stage 2 that was calculated with a similar algorithm in Stage 1; Changes with respect to Stage 1 submission: Self-reported information about modifications made to the algorithm for Stage 2; Number of submissions in Stage 2: The number of solutions that were submitted to Stage 2 with a similar algorithm; Sim1/Sim2: Filename of the submitted solutions for Stage 1; File name of the zip-file you are going to upload: Filename of the file uploaded to Stage 2; Full name of the algorithm: Self-reported full name of the algorithm used; Preferred Acronym: Self-reported acronym of the algorithm used; Algorithm-type: Self-reported type of algorithm used; Does your algorithm incorporate information derived from magnitude images?: Self-reported Yes/No; Regularization terms: Self-reported types of regularization terms involved; Did your algorithm use the provided frequency map or the four individual echo phase images?: Self-reported information about involved magnitude information; Publication-ready description of the reconstruction technique: Self-reported description of the algorithm; Publications that describe the algorithm: Self-reported literature reference; Algorithm publicly available?: Self-reported public availability of the algorithm; If your algorithm is not yet publicly available, would you be willing to make it available at the end of the challenge?: Self-reported willingness to share the algorithm code with the public; Specific information about this solution: Self-reported detailed information about the solution; Herewith, I permit the QSM Challenge committee to publish my uploaded files (calculated maps) after the completion of the challenge: Self reported agreement with publication of submitted solution; Ground truth was not explicitly or implicitly incorporated into your algorithm or solution: Self-reported confirmation that the ground truth was not incorporated in the solution.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5281/zenodo.3687196&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 0 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5281/zenodo.3687196&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
In most animals, the brain makes behavioral decisions that are transmitted by descending neurons to the nerve cord circuitry that produces behaviors. In insects, only a few descending neurons have been associated with specific behaviors. To explore how descending neurons control an insect's movements, we developed a novel method to systematically assay the behavioral effects of activating individual neurons on freely behaving terrestrial D. melanogaster. We calculated a two-dimensional representation of the entire behavior space explored by these flies and we associated descending neurons with specific behaviors by identifying regions of this space that were visited with increased frequency during optogenetic activation. Applying this approach across a large collection of descending neurons, we found that (1) activation of most of the descending neurons drove stereotyped behaviors, (2) in many cases multiple descending neurons activated similar behaviors, and (3) optogenetically-activated behaviors were often dependent on the behavioral state prior to activation. Movies of optogenetically activated split-Gal4 linesEach movie contains 1 second before and after optogenetic stimulation for all experimental (retinal +) and control (retinal -) flies for all stimulation trials.opto_movies.zip
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.fr89c0c&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 0 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.fr89c0c&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.3886/e170841v1 , 10.3886/e170841
This series of data files are intended for use in cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) research. The files include six datasets derived from the 2014-2019 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) Emergency Department (ED) files. NHAMCS provides users with detailed information on patient visits to EDs across the United States.The provided datasets include sociodemographic information on respondents’ census region, age, sex, and race, the patient's reason for visit, number of chronic conditions, and expected source of payment. Full ICD-9-CM and truncated ICD-10-CM codes were used to identify patient visits with an ADRD or other cognitive impairment. Brief and detailed summaries of the variables available in these datasets along with more detailed descriptions of performed calculations can be found in the provided data dictionaries. SAS, Stata, and CSV file formats are provided. record abstracts; Users of this resource should be familiar with complex survey design and appropriately apply the sample weights, strata, and primary sampling units for any analyses. patwt should be used for patient-visit-level analyses; edwt should be used for ED-level analyses. The list of ICD-9 and truncated ICD-10 codes are below. ICD-9 (2014-2015): 2900-, 2901-, 29010, 29011, 29012, 29013, 2902-, 29020, 29021, 2903-, 2904-, 29040, 29041, 29042, 29043, 2941-, 29410, 29411, 2942-, 29420, 29421, 331--, 3310-, 33111, 33119, 33182, 2908-, 2940-, 3312-, 3317-, 3318-, 33189, 797-- ICD-10 (2016-2019): F015, F028, F039, G300, G301, G308, G309, G310, G318, F04-, G311, G312, R418 Please note that for truncated ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes G318 and R418, there are additional possible diagnoses that may not truly indicate ADRD. From the NHAMCS website, these data are based on a “national sample of visits to emergency departments (EDs) in noninstitutional general and short-stay hospitals, exclusive of Federal, military, and Veterans Administration hospitals, located in the 50 States and the District of Columbia… Each emergency department is randomly assigned to a 4-week reporting period. During this period, data for a systematic random sample of visits are recorded by Census interviewers using a computerized Patient Record Form”. Smallest Geographic Unit: U.S. Census Region Response Rates: Please see full documentation from NHAMCS for the response rate in a given year. patwt should be used for patient-visit-level analyses; edwt should be used for ED-level analyses Systematic random sample with a stratified, clustered sampling design. Presence of Common Scales: N/A
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3886/e170841v1&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 0 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3886/e170841v1&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.5061/dryad.b20t3
Individual variability in delay of gratification (DG) is associated with a number of important outcomes in both non-human and human primates. Using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), this study describes the relationship between probabilistic estimates of white matter tracts projecting from the caudate to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and DG abilities in a sample of 49 captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). After accounting for time between collection of DTI scans and DG measurement, age and sex, higher white matter connectivity between the caudate and right dorsal PFC was found to be significantly associated with the acquisition (i.e. training phase) but not the maintenance of DG abilities. No other associations were found to be significant. The integrity of white matter connectivity between regions of the striatum and the PFC appear to be associated with inhibitory control in chimpanzees, with perturbations on this circuit potentially leading to a variety of maladaptive outcomes. Additionally, results have potential translational implications for understanding the pathophysiology of a number of psychiatric and clinical outcomes in humans. Latzman_et_al_DTI_DG
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.b20t3&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 0 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.b20t3&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
IsSupplementTo: Fiore and Gu (2021) Similar network compositions, but distinct neural dynamics underlying belief updating in environments with and without explicit outcomes. NeuroImage. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118821) Subject-specific behavioral data, model-based GLM and DCM estimations, jointly with scripts required to run model-based analysis.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.12751/g-node.kduj58&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 0 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.12751/g-node.kduj58&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.5061/dryad.k486f
Direct brain control of advanced robotic systems promises substantial improvements in health care, for example, to restore intuitive control of hand movements required for activities of daily living in quadriplegics, like holding a cup and drinking, eating with cutlery, or manipulating different objects. However, such integrated, brain- or neural-controlled robotic systems have yet to enter broader clinical use or daily life environments. We demonstrate full restoration of independent daily living activities, such as eating and drinking, in an everyday life scenario across six paraplegic individuals (five males, 30 ± 14 years) who used a noninvasive, hybrid brain/neural hand exoskeleton (B/NHE) to open and close their paralyzed hand. The results broadly suggest that brain/neural-assistive technology can restore autonomy and independence in quadriplegic individuals’ everyday life. Output dataset of EEG/EOG B/NHE controlOutput dataset of hybrid EEG/EOG brain/neural hand exoskeleton control.Soekadar2016_ZIP2.zipSource Codes and Software for EEG/EOG B/NHE control used in Soekadar et al. 2016This data container includes the custom-made modules for EEG/EOG-based B/NHE control that were embedded into the BCI2000 environment used in Soekadar et al. 2016. Please see the included tutorial for instructions on how to install and run the software.Soekadar2016_ZIP1.zip
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.k486f&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 0 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.k486f&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.5061/dryad.vp825
Attending to a task-relevant location changes how neural activity oscillates in the alpha band (8–13Hz) in posterior visual cortical areas. However, a clear understanding of the relationships between top-down attention, changes in alpha oscillations in visual cortex, and attention performance are still poorly understood. Here, we tested the degree to which the posterior alpha power tracked the locus of attention, the distribution of attention, and how well the topography of alpha could predict the locus of attention. We recorded magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data while subjects performed an attention demanding visual discrimination task that dissociated the direction of attention from the direction of a saccade to indicate choice. On some trials, an endogenous cue predicted the target’s location, while on others it contained no spatial information. When the target’s location was cued, alpha power decreased in sensors over occipital cortex contralateral to the attended visual field. When the cue did not predict the target’s location, alpha power again decreased in sensors over occipital cortex, but bilaterally, and increased in sensors over frontal cortex. Thus, the distribution and the topography of alpha reliably indicated the locus of covert attention. Together, these results suggest that alpha synchronization reflects changes in the excitability of populations of neurons whose receptive fields match the locus of attention. This is consistent with the hypothesis that alpha oscillations reflect the neural mechanisms by which top-down control of attention biases information processing and modulate the activity of neurons in visual cortex. IkkaiDataUpload
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.vp825&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 1 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.vp825&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.5061/dryad.7kk48
The persistence of back pain following acute back “sprains” is a serious public health problem with poorly understood pathophysiology. The recent finding that human subjects with chronic low back pain (LBP) have increased thickness and decreased mobility of the thoracolumbar fascia measured with ultrasound suggest that the fasciae of the back may be involved in LBP pathophysiology. This study used a porcine model to test the hypothesis that similar ultrasound findings can be produced experimentally in a porcine model by combining a local injury of fascia with movement restriction using a “hobble” device linking one foot to a chest harness for 8 weeks. Ultrasound measurements of thoracolumbar fascia thickness and shear plane mobility (shear strain) during passive hip flexion were made at the 8 week time point on the non-intervention side (injury and/or hobble). Injury alone caused both an increase in fascia thickness (p = .007) and a decrease in fascia shear strain on the non-injured side (p = .027). Movement restriction alone did not change fascia thickness but did decrease shear strain on the non-hobble side (p = .024). The combination of injury plus movement restriction had additive effects on reducing fascia mobility with a 52% reduction in shear strain compared with controls and a 28% reduction compared to movement restriction alone. These results suggest that a back injury involving fascia, even when healed, can affect the relative mobility of fascia layers away from the injured area, especially when movement is also restricted. pigpaper_thicknessUltrasound Thickness measurementspigpaper_SSUltrasound shear strain measurementspigpaper_wtPig Weightspigpaper_gait_dataGait measurementspigpaper_cgrp_dataSpinal cord substance P and CGRP measurementspigpaper_cortisolSalivary cortisol measurements
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.7kk48&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 0 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.7kk48&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Sequencing on the Illumina NextSeq 550 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) resulted in 159,204,153 (150 bp) single end reads. The reads were adapter trimmed and filtered based on the average quality scores, presence of indeterminate nucleotides and homopolymeric regions. Host background levels were determined by mapping filtered reads against human reference database using Bowtie2 mapper (v 2.2.9 (1)). The host-subtracted reads were de-novo assembled using MIRA (4.0 (2)) assembler. Contigs and unique singletons aligned against GenBank nucleotide database using Megablast tool from NCBI. Sequences with poor or no homology from Megablast were screened with BLASTX against the viral GenBank protein database. The filtered reads were mapped to the coronavirus and rhinovirus strains identified from blast. 1) Langmead B, Salzberg S. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods. 2012, 9:357-359. 2) Chevreux B, Wetter T, Suhai S. 1999. Genome sequence assembly using trace signals and additional sequence information. Comput Sci Biol 99:45–56 Currently, there are over 1.9 million confirmed cases of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) globally with over 590,000 cases in the United States.1 The number of COVID-19 positive children in the United States is unknown. A report summarizing 72,314 COVID-19 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention noted 416 COVID-19 positive children under 10.2 An observational study at Wuhan Children's Hospital noted 31 COVID-19 positive children under 1 year with the youngest confirmed case in a 1 day old.3 Cases were largely characterized by upper respiratory tract infection or pneumonia, fever, cough and pharyngeal erythema.3 Concomitant neurologic problems have been reported amongst COVID-19 positive adult patients. We are providing Zipped FASTq file for each of the following sample after human host-substraction and quality check. Original ID CII ID Species Sample Type Barcode IPS-553 COVID-AS Human Anal swab G5 IPS-554 COVID-BS Human nasopharyngeal swab G7 IPS-555 COVID-CSF Human CSF G9 IPS-556 COVID-SERUM Human Serum G11 IPS-557 COVID-PLASMA Human Plasma H1
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.xsj3tx9bs&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 1 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.xsj3tx9bs&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This archive contains sample output files for the sample data accompanying the Princeton Handbook for Reproducible Neuroimaging. Outputs include the NIfTI images converted using HeuDiConv (v0.8.0) and organized according to the BIDS standard, quality control evaluation using MRIQC (v0.15.1), data preprocessed using fMRIPrep (v20.2.0), and other auxiliary files. All outputs were created according to the procedures outlined in the handbook, and are intended to serve as a didactic reference for use with the handbook. The sample data from which the outputs are derived were acquired (with informed consent) using the ReproIn naming convention on a Siemens Skyra 3T MRI scanner. The sample data include a T1-weighted anatomical image, four functional runs with the “prettymouth” spoken story stimulus, and one functional run with a block design emotional faces task, as well as auxiliary scans (e.g., scout, soundcheck). The “prettymouth” story stimulus created by Yeshurun et al., 2017 and is available as part of the Narratives collection, and the emotional faces task is similar to Chai et al., 2015. The brain data are contributed by author S.A.N. and are authorized for non-anonymized distribution.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5281/zenodo.3727774&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 0 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5281/zenodo.3727774&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This repository contains information about submitted solutions and resulting analysis metrics of the 2019 Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Reconstruction Challenge. The original susceptibility maps submitted for participation in the challenge are available here and here. The package contains seven Comma-Separated Values (CSV) files and two PDF files: master_stage1_anonymized.csv: Results of stage 1 of the challenge at the time of presentation at the workshop (fully-blinded); master_stage2_snr1_anonymized.csv: Results of stage 2 of the challenge using the high noise dataset at the time of presentation at the workshop (fully-blinded); master_stage2_snr2_anonymized.csv: Results of stage 2 of the challenge using the low noise dataset at the time of presentation at the workshop (fully-blinded); submission_form_stage1.pdf: PDF export of the online form used in stage 1; submission_form_stage2.pdf: PDF export of the online form used in stage 2. For the manuscript, we analyzed these CSV files with scripts reported here. Each csv file contains metrics for all submitted solutions along with detailed information about the algorithm used, provided by the participant at the time of submission. The very first record in each file is a header containing a list of field names: normalized rmse: Whole-brain root-mean-squared error relative to ground truth; rmse_detrend_tissue: Root-mean-squared error relative to ground truth (after detrending) in grey and white matter mask; rmse_detrend_blood: Root-mean-squared error relative to ground truth (after detrending) using a one-pixel dilated vein mask; rmse_detrend_DGM: Root-mean-squared error relative to ground truth (after detrending) in a deep gray matter mask (substantia nigra & subthalamic nucleus, red nucleus, dentate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus and caudate); DeviationFromLinearSlope: Absolute difference between the slope of the average value of the six deep gray matter regions vs. the prescribed mean value and 1.0; CalcStreak: Estimation of the impact of the streaking artifact in a region of interest surrounding the calcification through the standard deviation of the difference map between reconstruction and the ground truth; DeviationFromCalcMoment: Absolute deviation from the volumetric susceptibility moment of the reconstructed calcification, compared to the ground truth (computed at in the high-resolution model); Submission Identifier: Self-chosen unique identifier of the submission; Submission Identifier of the corresponding Stage 1 submission: This is the Submission Identifier of the solution submitted to Stage 2 that was calculated with a similar algorithm in Stage 1; Changes with respect to Stage 1 submission: Self-reported information about modifications made to the algorithm for Stage 2; Number of submissions in Stage 2: The number of solutions that were submitted to Stage 2 with a similar algorithm; Sim1/Sim2: Filename of the submitted solutions for Stage 1; File name of the zip-file you are going to upload: Filename of the file uploaded to Stage 2; Full name of the algorithm: Self-reported full name of the algorithm used; Preferred Acronym: Self-reported acronym of the algorithm used; Algorithm-type: Self-reported type of algorithm used; Does your algorithm incorporate information derived from magnitude images?: Self-reported Yes/No; Regularization terms: Self-reported types of regularization terms involved; Did your algorithm use the provided frequency map or the four individual echo phase images?: Self-reported information about involved magnitude information; Publication-ready description of the reconstruction technique: Self-reported description of the algorithm; Publications that describe the algorithm: Self-reported literature reference; Algorithm publicly available?: Self-reported public availability of the algorithm; If your algorithm is not yet publicly available, would you be willing to make it available at the end of the challenge?: Self-reported willingness to share the algorithm code with the public; Specific information about this solution: Self-reported detailed information about the solution; Herewith, I permit the QSM Challenge committee to publish my uploaded files (calculated maps) after the completion of the challenge: Self reported agreement with publication of submitted solution; Ground truth was not explicitly or implicitly incorporated into your algorithm or solution: Self-reported confirmation that the ground truth was not incorporated in the solution.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5281/zenodo.3687196&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 0 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5281/zenodo.3687196&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
In most animals, the brain makes behavioral decisions that are transmitted by descending neurons to the nerve cord circuitry that produces behaviors. In insects, only a few descending neurons have been associated with specific behaviors. To explore how descending neurons control an insect's movements, we developed a novel method to systematically assay the behavioral effects of activating individual neurons on freely behaving terrestrial D. melanogaster. We calculated a two-dimensional representation of the entire behavior space explored by these flies and we associated descending neurons with specific behaviors by identifying regions of this space that were visited with increased frequency during optogenetic activation. Applying this approach across a large collection of descending neurons, we found that (1) activation of most of the descending neurons drove stereotyped behaviors, (2) in many cases multiple descending neurons activated similar behaviors, and (3) optogenetically-activated behaviors were often dependent on the behavioral state prior to activation. Movies of optogenetically activated split-Gal4 linesEach movie contains 1 second before and after optogenetic stimulation for all experimental (retinal +) and control (retinal -) flies for all stimulation trials.opto_movies.zip
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.fr89c0c&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 0 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.fr89c0c&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.3886/e170841v1 , 10.3886/e170841
This series of data files are intended for use in cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) research. The files include six datasets derived from the 2014-2019 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) Emergency Department (ED) files. NHAMCS provides users with detailed information on patient visits to EDs across the United States.The provided datasets include sociodemographic information on respondents’ census region, age, sex, and race, the patient's reason for visit, number of chronic conditions, and expected source of payment. Full ICD-9-CM and truncated ICD-10-CM codes were used to identify patient visits with an ADRD or other cognitive impairment. Brief and detailed summaries of the variables available in these datasets along with more detailed descriptions of performed calculations can be found in the provided data dictionaries. SAS, Stata, and CSV file formats are provided. record abstracts; Users of this resource should be familiar with complex survey design and appropriately apply the sample weights, strata, and primary sampling units for any analyses. patwt should be used for patient-visit-level analyses; edwt should be used for ED-level analyses. The list of ICD-9 and truncated ICD-10 codes are below. ICD-9 (2014-2015): 2900-, 2901-, 29010, 29011, 29012, 29013, 2902-, 29020, 29021, 2903-, 2904-, 29040, 29041, 29042, 29043, 2941-, 29410, 29411, 2942-, 29420, 29421, 331--, 3310-, 33111, 33119, 33182, 2908-, 2940-, 3312-, 3317-, 3318-, 33189, 797-- ICD-10 (2016-2019): F015, F028, F039, G300, G301, G308, G309, G310, G318, F04-, G311, G312, R418 Please note that for truncated ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes G318 and R418, there are additional possible diagnoses that may not truly indicate ADRD. From the NHAMCS website, these data are based on a “national sample of visits to emergency departments (EDs) in noninstitutional general and short-stay hospitals, exclusive of Federal, military, and Veterans Administration hospitals, located in the 50 States and the District of Columbia… Each emergency department is randomly assigned to a 4-week reporting period. During this period, data for a systematic random sample of visits are recorded by Census interviewers using a computerized Patient Record Form”. Smallest Geographic Unit: U.S. Census Region Response Rates: Please see full documentation from NHAMCS for the response rate in a given year. patwt should be used for patient-visit-level analyses; edwt should be used for ED-level analyses Systematic random sample with a stratified, clustered sampling design. Presence of Common Scales: N/A
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3886/e170841v1&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations | 0 | |
popularity | Average | |
influence | Average | |
impulse | Average |
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3886/e170841v1&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.5061/dryad.b20t3
Individual variability in delay of gratification (DG) is associated with a number of important outcomes in both non-human and human primates. Using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), this study describes the relationship between probabilistic estimates of white matter tracts projecting from the caudate to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and DG abilities in a sample of 49 captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). After accounting for time between collection of DTI scans and DG measurement, age and sex, higher white matter connectivity between the caudate and right dorsal PFC was found to be significantly associated with the acquisition (i.e. training phase) but not the maintenance of DG abilities. No other associations were found to be significant. The integrity of white matter connectivity between regions of the striatum and the PFC appear to be associated with inhibitory control in chimpanzees, with perturbations on this circuit potentially leading to a variety of maladaptive outcomes. Additionally, results have potential translational implications for understanding the pathophysiology of a number of psychiatric and clinical outcomes in humans. Latzman_et_al_DTI_DG