• Research softwareclose
• Other research productsclose
• Other ORP type close
• Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage close
• Rural Digital Europe close

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner. The overall aim of the research was to assess the influence of changes in agricultural policy and regulation on those farms which, during the productivist era, their operators had successfully navigated to a position of dominance in the industry. Four specific objectives arose from this broad aim, which sought to examine large-scale commercial farming overall and to track development and succession on individual matched farms: to investigate how farms, which were relatively large in 1977, subsequently developed during the period of agricultural policy adjustment in the 1980s/1990s; to examine the dynamics of agricultural production systems in relation to the development of large-scale farm businesses between 1941 and the late 1990s; to investigate the opinions and responses of these large-scale farmers to agricultural policy adjustment with the intention of establishing their level of engagement with post-productivity policy measures; to contribute to the development of large-scale farm businesses in the light of the post-productivist transition model of farm business adjustment and agri-environmental change. The data file for 1978 and 1981 for this study contains a subset of the variables from part of the dataset 'Labour and Machinery on Large Arable Farms, 1978-1980', held at the UK Data Archive under SN:1872. Main Topics: The dataset comprises a series of files relating to large-scale farms in the South East of England, which are defined by reference to their total area as either 182 hectares or more in 1941 and/or 300 hectares or more in 1978. One data file comprises a transcription of mainly quantitative elements of the National Farm Survey records of 1941-1943, and includes information relating to farm area, crop and livestock production, labour and machinery usage and an assessment of the physical and managerial condition of the farm. The data file for the 1978 and 1981 surveys cover a similar range of information relating to farm area, crop and livestock production, and labour and machinery usage, though the 1981 survey is more limited. The data file for the most recent survey, carried out between November 1998 and April 1999, also includes a similar range of agricultural variables together with information about farmer involvement with a range of non-agricultural activities and other contemporary issues affecting agriculture. These cover government conservation schemes, diversification, contracting, succession and use of information technology. The 1998-1999 survey includes both factual and attitudinal responses. No sampling (total universe) Simple random sample Volunteer sample The 1941 data file contains the whole universe of 'large-scale' farms in the study area. The 1978/1 Face-to-face interview Postal survey Transcription of existing materials the 1941 data file is a partial transcription of selected records from the National Farm Survey hel

24x36 mm, gélatine plan-film. Le lieu exact de prise de vue n'a pas été identifié au moment du traitement de la photographie.

24x36 mm, gélatine plan-film. Le lieu exact de prise de vue n'a pas été identifié au moment du traitement de la photographie.

24x36 mm, gélatine plan-film. Le lieu exact de prise de vue n'a pas été identifié au moment du traitement de la photographie.

Aineistossa vastaajat kertovat omasta arjestaan ja kokemuksistaan lemmikkien kanssa niin lapsuudessa kuin nykyhetkessä. Suurin osa muistoista koskee kissoja ja koiria, mutta monella on ollut myös muita eläimiä lemmikkinä, esimerkiksi kaloja, kaneja, hamstereita, lintuja ja kilpikonnia. Kirjoittajat ovat kertoneet muisteluissaan esimerkiksi lemmikin roolista perheessä, vuorovaikutuksesta eläimen kanssa, ja minkälaisia tavaroita ja ruokia lemmikille on hankittu. Vastaajat ovat myös kertoneet tarinoita tilanteista, joissa lemmikistä on joutunut eroon tai kun lemmikki on täytynyt lopettaa, sekä näihin tilanteisiin liittyvistä tunteista. Monet ovat muistelleet lapsuudenkodin eläimiä ja arvioineet, miten suhtautuminen kotieläimiin on muuttunut vuosikymmenten aikana. Toiset ovat kirjoittaneet lemmikeistä koko oman elämäntarinansa kautta, toiset taas vain yksittäisen mieleen painuneen muiston. Aineisto sisältää 72 kirjoitusta. Osa vastaajista on lähettänyt muistelunsa mukana myös valokuvia lemmikeistään. Keruun järjesti Suomen Akatemian tutkimushanke Eläintentoimijuus yhteiskunnassa: näkökulmia Suomesta 1890 – 2040, Itä-Suomen yliopiston Ihmistieteellisen eläintutkimuksen tutkimusryhmä, kirjailija Reetta Niemelä ja Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. Vastaajien taustatietoja ovat ikä, sukupuoli, ammatti ja asuinpaikka. Aineistosta on tehty jatkokäyttäjälle html-versio, jonka hakemiston avulla kirjoituksia on helppo selata. This dataset contains written responses about Finnish people's experiences with pets in childhood and in the present. Most of the memories concern cats and dogs, but stories about other pets are included as well. The respondents wrote about the role of the pet in the family and interaction with the pet, for instance. They also wrote about having to give up the pet or put it down as well as emotions relating to these situations. Many respondents reminisced pets in childhood homes and how their attitudes towards pets had changed over decades. The dataset comprises 72 responses. Some respondents also attached pictures of their pets. The data collection was organised by the Academy of Finland's research project "Animal Agency in Human Society: Finnish Perspectives, 1890 - 2040", Human-Animal Studies network at the University of Eastern Finland, author Reetta Niemelä, and Finnish Literature Society. Background information includes age, gender, occupation and place of residence. The data were organised into an easy to use html version at FSD. The dataset is only available in Finnish. Ei-todennäköisyysotanta: itsestään muotoutunut näyteNonprobability.Availability Non-probability: AvailabilityNonprobability.Availability Oma kirjoitus tai päiväkirja: sähköpostilla saatuSelfAdministeredWritingsAndDiaries.Email Oma kirjoitus tai päiväkirja: paperimuotoinen kirjoitusSelfAdministeredWritingsAndDiaries.Paper Oma kirjoitus tai päiväkirja: verkon kautta saatuSelfAdministeredWritingsAndDiaries.WebBased Self-administered writings and/or diaries: E-mailSelfAdministeredWritingsAndDiaries.Email Self-administered writings and/or diaries: PaperSelfAdministeredWritingsAndDiaries.Paper Self-administered writings and/or diaries: Web-basedSelfAdministeredWritingsAndDiaries.WebBased

24x36 mm, gélatine plan-film. Le lieu exact de prise de vue n'a pas été identifié au moment du traitement de la photographie.

This special issue of the journal Photography & Culture (volume 14, issue 3) calls for the development of research into the various local and global political circumstances that have influenced the absorption of historical photographs into the realm of digital heritage, alongside the study of the digital photographic heritagization practices triggered by this very process. Presenting case studies from Australia, Britain, Israel, Palestine, Russia and South Africa, it analyses how historical photographs, digital heritage, and cultural conflicts have become interlocked in multiple countries around the globe since the post-Cold War rising prevalence of digital technology, global interconnectedness, and liberal democracy. These related conditions, it is suggested, have informed the growing digital heritagization of historical photographs and the methods used for their digitization, safeguarding and dissemination. Therefore, as a whole, the special issue argues that the confluence of historical photographs and digital heritage must not be understood as a mere response to technological progress but as an articulation of politically-charged aspirations to capitalize on the common association of photographs with the past, to administer approaches to differing cultural values in a time of imposing liberal-democratic politics of consensus.

onderzoeksrapport

24x36 mm, gélatine plan-film. Le lieu exact de prise de vue n'a pas été identifié au moment du traitement de la photographie.