• 2020-2024close
• Open Access close
• Closed Access close
• Research data close
• Research software close
• Other research products close
• Other ORP type close
• Chinese close

Dianhua shipin huijian. N.d. “Dianhua shipin huijian fang taopao yu’an chuzhi liucheng 电话视频会见防逃跑预案处置流程 (Handling procedure and plan for escape prevention related to video meetings).” N.d. (file creation timestamp: February 5, 2018). Source: Konasheher County PSB. Uploaded by Adrian Zenz Part of the Xinjiang Police Files www.xinjiangpolicefiles.org See related research publication at https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/jeacs/article/view/7336

A Chinese translation of the DOAJ Application form.

journal chinois

Le thème de ce numéro spécial est « Multiculturalité, matérialité et art contemporain ». La multiculturalité est un nouveau concept dans l’art contemporain et la recherche esthétique, qui s’inscrit dans la lignée des concepts établis d’internationalisme, de transnationalité, de multiculturalisme, d’hybridité et d’interculturalité. Le concept de multiculturalité vise à mettre en évidence les diverses formes et manifestations du pluralisme culturel que nous partageons tous dans le contexte contemporain de la mondialisation. La question de la multiculturalité dans l’art et l’esthétique contemporains est avant tout différente de la vision de Charles Taylor du multiculturalisme en tant que support politique de l’identité. La signification esthétique de la multiculturalité dans le travail d’un artiste ou d’une œuvre d’art est qu’il cherche à transcender les limites de la monoculture présentée par les civilisations établies et à mettre en place les possibilités du pluralisme culturel à travers sa création. Ainsi, la multiculturalité se distingue des questions d’identité ou de nationalisme culturel, et se concentre sur la portée de l’expérience artistique.En outre, dans l’esthétique contemporaine, parmi les nombreuses pratiques artistiques qui abordent la multiculturalité, la question esthétique de la matérialité a retenu l’attention. Il s’agit en particulier de l’intérêt de l’anthropologie pour la culture matérielle. Ceci est différent de la perspective matérialiste du matérialisme moderne. La signification de la matérialité d’une œuvre d’art n’est pas seulement la matérialité de la forme de l’œuvre. La matérialité de l’objet n’est pas une propriété fixe de la matière, mais un processus et une relation. La matérialité de l’objet est également différente de l’objet d’étude objectif de la physique moderne. Non seulement les différentes disciplines ont des compréhensions et des interprétations différentes de la matérialité des objets, mais la matérialité des objets est la base de la création artistique dans différentes régions culturelles. La matérialité des objets est également une riche source d’informations transmises silencieusement à travers différentes cultures, révélant par défaut la multiculturalité des objets et des artistes. The theme of this special issue is “Multiculturality, Materiality and Contemporary Art”. Multiculturality is a new concept in contemporary art and aesthetic research, following the established concepts of internationalism, transnationality, multiculturalism, hybridity and interculturality. The concept of multiculturality aims to highlight the various forms and manifestations of cultural pluralism that we all share in the contemporary context of globalisation. The question of multiculturality in contemporary art and aesthetics is above all different from Charles Taylor's view of multiculturalism as a political support of identity. The aesthetic significance of multiculturality in the work of an artist or artwork is that it seeks to transcend the limits of the monoculture presented by established civilisations and to set up the possibilities of cultural pluralism through its creation. Thus, multiculturality is distinct from questions of cultural identity or nationalism, and focuses on the scope of the artistic experience.Furthermore, in contemporary aesthetics, among the many artistic practices that address multiculturality, the aesthetic question of materiality has received attention, in particular, the anthropological interest in material culture. This is different from the materialist perspective of modern materialism. The significance of the materiality of a work of art is not only the materiality of the form of the artwork. The materiality of the object is not a fixed property of matter, but a process and a relationship. The materiality of the object is also different from the objective object of study of modern physics. Not only do different disciplines have different understandings and interpretations of the materiality of objects, but the materiality of objects is the basis of artistic creation in different cultural regions. The materiality of objects is also a rich source of information silently transmitted across different cultures, revealing by default the multiculturality of objects and artists.

我沒有談的那場戀愛‒ 線上看完整版電影 【數位‧日文版】 我沒有談的那場戀愛‒ 線上看完整版電影 【數位‧日文版】

Notice consacrée au texte JY129 Zhongtian ziwei xingzhen baochan de la Quintessence Canon taoïste (dynastie Ming).

Speech delivered at June 4 Candlelight Vigil, Vancouver Society in Support of Democratic Movement (VSSDM), outside the PRC Consulate, 3380 Granville St.

China Internet Healthcare Research Development Analysis and Outlook 2023 --Trend Tracking and Monthly Topics With the rapid development of information technology, the field of Internet healthcare is undergoing unprecedented change. This change not only plays an important role in improving medical services and medical efficiency, but also plays a key role in innovating medical models and promoting the development of the medical industry. The emergence of Internet healthcare has, to a certain extent, changed the way we seek medical treatment, alleviated the problem of strained medical resources, and also provided patients with more convenient and efficient medical services. However, Internet healthcare also faces many challenges in the process of development, such as data security, privacy protection, medical quality assurance and other issues. These challenges not only pose a threat to the development of Internet healthcare, but also pose a potential threat to the health and rights of patients. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to discuss the current situation and development trend of Internet healthcare, and to propose corresponding research problems and solutions. Internet healthcare has experienced a decade of floundering, from sprouting in 2010, to taking off in 2013, and then reaching its first high point in 2016. At that time, Internet enterprises believed that "Internet+Medicine" could break the predicament of asymmetric medical information and irrational resource allocation, and change the phenomenon of difficult and expensive medical treatment in China; the giants were eager to try to guide the end demand through the Internet, break the monopoly of public hospitals, reshape the medical industry, and realise the optimal allocation of medical resources, while at the same time, they were also making efforts in their own way. The giants tried to break the monopoly of public hospitals and reshape the medical industry through the Internet to achieve the optimal allocation of medical resources, and at the same time add the last and most difficult piece of the jigsaw puzzle: medical care. However, as policies have not been as expected, technological breakthroughs have been slow, high-quality medical resources are lacking, and patients' willingness to pay is low and expensive, Internet healthcare enterprises have burned through the first wave of capital market enthusiasm and funds in the process of building their respective ecosystems, but profitability is still far from being realised. Capital then enters a cooling-off period, and small and medium-sized enterprises leave the market in dismay, leaving unicorns behind, struggling to make a breakthrough. Introduction: A. Research Background A.1 Big Health and Digital Future Creating an Advantage in Health Technology Health Technology Rising to the top Connecting with patients and practitioners Connecting with partners Shifting focus to the digital patient journey A.2 Building a win-win ecosystem A.3 Strong and cascading policy support B. Research Status and Points of Controversy C. Purpose and Significance of the Study II. Literature Review A. Development history of Internet healthcare B. Major Models and Technologies of Internet Healthcare C. Industry and Industry Environment III. Research Questions and Hypotheses A. Research Questions How can Internet healthcare alleviate the problem of strained medical resources? How can Internet healthcare improve the efficiency and quality of medical services? How does Internet healthcare protect patient privacy and data security? Internet medical digital divide The situation of Chinese Internet users: Serious Challenges Internet connectivity issues Socio-Economic Disparities Geographic Challenges Digital literacy and skills gaps Age-related barriers -References: IV. Research methodology A. Research Design B. Sample and Data Collection C. Data Analysis Methods D. Reliability and Validity Assessment of Research Methods V. Research Findings A Definition and Positioning of Internet Hospitals B Consumer Insights C Algorithm-driven: advanced analytics empowering pharma companies in the digital era Easy to Scale: AI and Machine Learning Technologies Provide Solution Scalability How AI can help cancer patients get the right treatment Data-driven solutions for clear business challenges Understanding Data Turning insights into action Realising Impact Expanding Healthcare Future Development Asymmetric Development What's Different About SAMDs 1. Findings The role of Internet healthcare in alleviating healthcare resource constraints. The role of Internet healthcare in improving the efficiency and quality of healthcare services. The role of Internet healthcare in protecting patients' privacy and data security. 2. Contributions and limitations of the study 3. Potential of virtual healthcare 4. Research Outlook and Recommendations Five Trends Research outlook: future research direction and focus, such as expanding research areas and deepening research questions Research Suggestions: Suggestions from the perspectives of policy, technology, and service to further promote the development of Internet healthcare References: Official website This is the Chinese version, English and PDF here https://figshare.com/articles/preprint/__tex/23821020 This article is a literature review on research theory and data introduction. As a reference material for data research and learning, it is not used as research theory or research conclusion.