4 Research products, page 1 of 1
Loading
- Publication . Article . Preprint . 2021Open Access EnglishAuthors:Elizabeth Wrigley-Field; Mathew V. Kiang; Alicia R Riley; Magali Barbieri; Yea-Hung Chen; Kate A. Duchowny; Ellicott C. Matthay; David Van Riper; Kirrthana Jegathesan; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; +1 moreElizabeth Wrigley-Field; Mathew V. Kiang; Alicia R Riley; Magali Barbieri; Yea-Hung Chen; Kate A. Duchowny; Ellicott C. Matthay; David Van Riper; Kirrthana Jegathesan; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Jonathon P. Leider;Publisher: HAL CCSDCountries: France, United States
COVID-19 mortality increases markedly with age and is also substantially higher among Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) populations in the United States. These two facts can have conflicting implications because BIPOC populations are younger than white populations. In analyses of California and Minnesota—demographically divergent states—we show that COVID vaccination schedules based solely on age benefit the older white populations at the expense of younger BIPOC populations with higher risk of death from COVID-19. We find that strategies that prioritize high-risk geographic areas for vaccination at all ages better target mortality risk than age-based strategies alone, although they do not always perform as well as direct prioritization of high-risk racial/ethnic groups. Vaccination schemas directly implicate equitability of access, both domestically and globally. Age-based COVID-19 vaccination prioritizes white people above higher-risk others; geographic prioritization improves equity. Description
Average popularityAverage popularity In bottom 99%Average influencePopularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.Average influence In bottom 99%Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.add Add to ORCIDPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product. - Publication . Article . Conference object . Preprint . Part of book or chapter of book . 2021Open AccessAuthors:Raj Ratn Pranesh; Mehrdad Farokhnejad; Ambesh Shekhar; Genoveva Vargas-Solar;Raj Ratn Pranesh; Mehrdad Farokhnejad; Ambesh Shekhar; Genoveva Vargas-Solar;Publisher: Springer International PublishingCountry: France
International audience; This paper presents the Multilingual COVID-19 Analysis Method (CMTA) for detecting and observing the spread of misinformation about this disease within texts. CMTA proposes a data science (DS) pipeline that applies machine learning models for processing, classifying (Dense-CNN) and analyzing (MBERT) multilingual (micro)-texts. DS pipeline data preparation tasks extract features from multilingual textual data and categorize it into specific information classes (i.e., 'false', 'partly false', 'misleading'). The CMTA pipeline has been experimented with multilingual micro-texts (tweets), showing misinformation spread across different languages. To assess the performance of CMTA and put it in perspective, we performed a comparative analysis of CMTA with eight monolingual models used for detecting misinformation. The comparison shows that CMTA has surpassed various monolingual models and suggests that it can be used as a general method for detecting misinformation in multilingual micro-texts. CMTA experimental results show misinformation trends about COVID-19 in different languages during the first pandemic months.
Average popularityAverage popularity In bottom 99%Average influencePopularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.Average influence In bottom 99%Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.add Add to ORCIDPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product. - Publication . Other literature type . Preprint . 2020EnglishAuthors:Edmond, Jennifer; Basaraba, Nicole; Doran, Michelle; Garnett, Vicky; Grile, Courtney Helen; Papaki, Eliza; Tóth-Czifra, Erzsébet;Edmond, Jennifer; Basaraba, Nicole; Doran, Michelle; Garnett, Vicky; Grile, Courtney Helen; Papaki, Eliza; Tóth-Czifra, Erzsébet;Publisher: HAL CCSDCountry: France
- Publication . Preprint . 2020Open Access EnglishAuthors:Jocelyn Raude; Marion Debin; Cécile Souty; Caroline Guerris; Iclement Turbelin; Alessandra Falchi; Isabelle Bonmarin; Daniela Paolotti; Yamir Moreno; Chinelo Obi; +5 moreJocelyn Raude; Marion Debin; Cécile Souty; Caroline Guerris; Iclement Turbelin; Alessandra Falchi; Isabelle Bonmarin; Daniela Paolotti; Yamir Moreno; Chinelo Obi; Jim Duggan; Ania Wisnia; Antoine Flahault; Thierry Blanchon; Vittoria Colizza;Publisher: HAL CCSDCountry: France
The recent emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 in China has raised the spectre of a novel, potentially catastrophic pandemic in both scientific and lay communities throughout the world. In this particular context, people have been accused of being excessively pessimistic regarding the future consequences of this emerging health threat. However, consistent with previous research in social psychology, a large survey conducted in Europe in the early stage of the COVID-19 epidemic shows that the majority of respondents was actually overly optimistic about the risk of infection. https://psyarxiv.com/364qj/
Average popularityAverage popularity In bottom 99%Average influencePopularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.Average influence In bottom 99%Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.add Add to ORCIDPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
4 Research products, page 1 of 1
Loading
- Publication . Article . Preprint . 2021Open Access EnglishAuthors:Elizabeth Wrigley-Field; Mathew V. Kiang; Alicia R Riley; Magali Barbieri; Yea-Hung Chen; Kate A. Duchowny; Ellicott C. Matthay; David Van Riper; Kirrthana Jegathesan; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; +1 moreElizabeth Wrigley-Field; Mathew V. Kiang; Alicia R Riley; Magali Barbieri; Yea-Hung Chen; Kate A. Duchowny; Ellicott C. Matthay; David Van Riper; Kirrthana Jegathesan; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Jonathon P. Leider;Publisher: HAL CCSDCountries: France, United States
COVID-19 mortality increases markedly with age and is also substantially higher among Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) populations in the United States. These two facts can have conflicting implications because BIPOC populations are younger than white populations. In analyses of California and Minnesota—demographically divergent states—we show that COVID vaccination schedules based solely on age benefit the older white populations at the expense of younger BIPOC populations with higher risk of death from COVID-19. We find that strategies that prioritize high-risk geographic areas for vaccination at all ages better target mortality risk than age-based strategies alone, although they do not always perform as well as direct prioritization of high-risk racial/ethnic groups. Vaccination schemas directly implicate equitability of access, both domestically and globally. Age-based COVID-19 vaccination prioritizes white people above higher-risk others; geographic prioritization improves equity. Description
Average popularityAverage popularity In bottom 99%Average influencePopularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.Average influence In bottom 99%Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.add Add to ORCIDPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product. - Publication . Article . Conference object . Preprint . Part of book or chapter of book . 2021Open AccessAuthors:Raj Ratn Pranesh; Mehrdad Farokhnejad; Ambesh Shekhar; Genoveva Vargas-Solar;Raj Ratn Pranesh; Mehrdad Farokhnejad; Ambesh Shekhar; Genoveva Vargas-Solar;Publisher: Springer International PublishingCountry: France
International audience; This paper presents the Multilingual COVID-19 Analysis Method (CMTA) for detecting and observing the spread of misinformation about this disease within texts. CMTA proposes a data science (DS) pipeline that applies machine learning models for processing, classifying (Dense-CNN) and analyzing (MBERT) multilingual (micro)-texts. DS pipeline data preparation tasks extract features from multilingual textual data and categorize it into specific information classes (i.e., 'false', 'partly false', 'misleading'). The CMTA pipeline has been experimented with multilingual micro-texts (tweets), showing misinformation spread across different languages. To assess the performance of CMTA and put it in perspective, we performed a comparative analysis of CMTA with eight monolingual models used for detecting misinformation. The comparison shows that CMTA has surpassed various monolingual models and suggests that it can be used as a general method for detecting misinformation in multilingual micro-texts. CMTA experimental results show misinformation trends about COVID-19 in different languages during the first pandemic months.
Average popularityAverage popularity In bottom 99%Average influencePopularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.Average influence In bottom 99%Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.add Add to ORCIDPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product. - Publication . Other literature type . Preprint . 2020EnglishAuthors:Edmond, Jennifer; Basaraba, Nicole; Doran, Michelle; Garnett, Vicky; Grile, Courtney Helen; Papaki, Eliza; Tóth-Czifra, Erzsébet;Edmond, Jennifer; Basaraba, Nicole; Doran, Michelle; Garnett, Vicky; Grile, Courtney Helen; Papaki, Eliza; Tóth-Czifra, Erzsébet;Publisher: HAL CCSDCountry: France
- Publication . Preprint . 2020Open Access EnglishAuthors:Jocelyn Raude; Marion Debin; Cécile Souty; Caroline Guerris; Iclement Turbelin; Alessandra Falchi; Isabelle Bonmarin; Daniela Paolotti; Yamir Moreno; Chinelo Obi; +5 moreJocelyn Raude; Marion Debin; Cécile Souty; Caroline Guerris; Iclement Turbelin; Alessandra Falchi; Isabelle Bonmarin; Daniela Paolotti; Yamir Moreno; Chinelo Obi; Jim Duggan; Ania Wisnia; Antoine Flahault; Thierry Blanchon; Vittoria Colizza;Publisher: HAL CCSDCountry: France
The recent emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 in China has raised the spectre of a novel, potentially catastrophic pandemic in both scientific and lay communities throughout the world. In this particular context, people have been accused of being excessively pessimistic regarding the future consequences of this emerging health threat. However, consistent with previous research in social psychology, a large survey conducted in Europe in the early stage of the COVID-19 epidemic shows that the majority of respondents was actually overly optimistic about the risk of infection. https://psyarxiv.com/364qj/
Average popularityAverage popularity In bottom 99%Average influencePopularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.Average influence In bottom 99%Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.add Add to ORCIDPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.